The Fighting Blue Ridgers: Combined Arms Capabilities Of The US Army’s 80th Infantry Division in World War II, 1944-1945

0.00

Add to Wishlist
Add to Wishlist

Description

The Fighting Blue Ridgers: Combined Arms Capabilities of the US Army’s 80th Infantry Division in World War II, 1944-1945, is a well-researched arts and humanities Master’s Thesis topic, it is to be used as a guide or framework for your Academic Research.

Abstract

This study of the Second World War examines the tactics employed by the 80th Infantry Division of the United States Army in the European Theater of Operations in 1944 and 1945.

Early historiography portrays American units as brave but less sophisticated than their German adversaries.

However, recent scholarship praises American combat capabilities. Drawing largely upon official Army records and firsthand accounts from American soldiers,

this thesis argues that the 80th Infantry Division developed into a highly effective fighting force in the European Theater when it properly employed the concept of combined arms (the coordination of infantry, artillery, and armor) on the battlefront with some exceptions.

This study uses three examples from the 80th Division’s combat record that show the importance of combined arms and the sophistication of American fighting forces late in World War II: the closing of the Falaise Pocket, the crossing of the Moselle River, and in the Battle of the Bulge.

This study fills a key historiographical gap in scholars’ understanding of the capabilities of American military forces in World War II. High- and low-level studies exist of armies and companies, but little analysis has been awarded to the divisions.

It is crucial to understand division-level combat because changes in WWII doctrine, to include the implementation of combined arms, were “codified, refined, and disseminated” at this echelon of command.

1 In the end, this work provides a more complete picture of the way in which the United States Army fought the war against Hitler’s Wehrmacht.

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

This study of the Second World War examines the tactics employed by the 80th
Infantry Division (ID) of the United States Army in the European Theater of Operations
in 1944 and 1945.

Early historiography portrays American units as brave but less sophisticated than their German adversaries. However, recent scholarship praises American combat capabilities with the realization that the United States Army did not rely solely on material superiority in battle.

Drawing largely upon official Army records and firsthand accounts from American soldiers, this thesis argues that the 80th Infantry Division was a highly effective fighting force in the European Theater when it properly employed the concept of combined arms (the coordination of infantry, artillery, and armor) on the battlefront with some exceptions.

Furthermore, it argues that the Division
learned from its previous combat experiences, though not always on a linear trajectory, when engaged in combat with the forces of Nazi Germany.

This study uses three examples from the 80th Division’s combat record to demonstrate this, highlighting the importance of combined arms and the sophistication of American fighting forces late in World War II: the Battle of Argentan-Falaise Gap and the closing of the Falaise Pocket, the crossing of the Moselle River, and the Battle of the Bulge.

This thesis fills a key historiographical gap in scholars’ understanding of the
capabilities of American military forces in World War II. High- and low-level studies
exist of armies and companies, but little analysis has been awarded to the divisions.

It is crucial to understand division-level combat because changes in American WWII doctrine, to include the implementation of combined arms, were standardized at this echelon

Brand

YourPastQuestions Brand

Additional information

Type

Master's Thesis

Category

Arts and Humanities

No of Chapters

5

Reference

Yes

Format

PDF

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.